So Clearly Buffalo is out of the running, 

And 1 vote for each Qnap and Synology 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jean-Paul Natola

 


From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:58:37 +0000








My experience as well….
 

 John W. Cook
Network Operations Manager
Partnership For Strong Families
5950 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, Fl 32607
Office (352) 244-1610
Cell     (352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4

 


From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of David Lum

Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 9:53 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server


 
Unless it’s a Buffalo Terrastation….
L (or at least the version I have which is ~4 yrs old).
 


From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Guyer, Don

Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 6:37 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server


 
CIFS is the share from the storage (NAS/SAN) perspective. Once the server is 
connected to the CIFS share, you then apply NTFS perms to it, just like you 
would
 any folder/share.
 

Regards,
 
Don Guyer

Catholic Health East - Information Technology
Enterprise Directory & Messaging Services

3805 West Chester Pike, Suite 100, Newtown Square, Pa  19073
email:
[email protected]
Office:  610.550.3595 | Cell: 610.955.6528 | Fax: 610.271.9440
For immediate assistance, please open a Service Desk ticket or call the 
helpdesk @ 610-492-3839.

 

 


From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Richard McClary

Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 9:30 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server


 
They may call it “CIFS” rather than “NTSF”
 
--
richard
 

From:
[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Jonathan Link

Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 8:18 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server

 

Do they have NTFS permissions on those things, yet?  That's probably a major 
feature to be looking for...


 

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:11 AM, John Cook <[email protected]> wrote:


Be mindful of the fact that while some claim AD support they don’t necessarily 
execute it well. Buffalo Terrastations come to mind….. YMMV
 

 John W. Cook
Network Operations Manager
Partnership For Strong Families
5950 NW 1st Place
Gainesville, Fl 32607
Office
(352) 244-1610
Cell    
(352) 215-6944
MCSE, MCP+I, MCTS, CompTIA A+, N+, VSP4, VTSP4

 


From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jim

Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 8:57 AM




To: '[email protected]'

Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server






 
And that it supports AD for permissions.
 


From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of J- P

Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 8:56 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server


 

So it seems like more folks ar3 leaning to the NAS, any particular features I 
should be looking for?



Aside from ensuring supports X number of connections?



From:
[email protected]

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server

Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:49:06 -0400

print yes, file is the other question, if I go to NAS do I "need" windows file 
server? wouldn't the NAS take care of that?
The NAS box should take care of shares, etc. internally. But make sure it has 
the capacity to support the number of planned connections.
 
John M.
 


From:
[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of J- P

Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 9:19 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server


 

print yes, file is the other question, if I go to NAS do I "need" windows file 
server? wouldn't the NAS take care of that?



The Exchange is a guest on the 2012 hyper-v host, and there is nothing else on 
it, but in my research i see both negative and positive feedback regarding 
loading another guest-



In theory being that 2012 allows/gives 2 guest 2012's with a single license, I 
could easily spin up another guest and make it a DC , DHCP, DNS , etc... server.





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jean-Paul Natola

 




From:
[email protected]

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server

Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:07:56 -0400

Are you migrating the file/print to another machine?  I am hoping you don't 
have anything on the Exchange server but Exchange.

 

Jon

 




From:
[email protected]

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server

Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:02:47 -0400

Already planned,  VM 2003dc  will become 2012 DC

and current "all in one" 2003 dc will become 2012 DC (already have the Cals)



that will give me 2 dedicated 2012 DC's 



Looking to stay under 5k, and I have no problems with Dell outlet r510 or r710 -



just trying to decide NAS or Server, and of course I dont need to populate all 
the drive bays right away, heck there used to a


 7200k sata1 mirror- 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jean-Paul Natola

 




From:
[email protected]

To: [email protected]

Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server

Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:51:19 -0400

I really hate to do this but you will first want to start with a budget and 
then try to fit what fits into that budget.  As an aside you might want to look 
at upgrading to at least
 2008 R2 or better 2012, have at least 2 DC's, and get all the file/print off 
the DC when you go this route.

 

Jon

 




From:
[email protected]

To: [email protected]

Subject: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server

Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:43:30 -0400

Company background,



30 yrs old, started with 2 guys, went to to computers in the late 90's had 
about 20 users, 1 W2k server and a 120 gb SNAP-



Fast forward , 2008,  30 users, sql 2005 DB  (consultant at the time ) installs 
a new 1U 2003 80gb raid server  for sql DB , and another 1U server with a 
mirrored 750gb drive , serving as  DC/File/Print/DNS Server.



Fast Forward 2013 - single site , single domain



1. ESXi hosting a VM 2008 Citrix TS, and a VM 2003 DC (no storage really 
available)

1. Windows 2012 Hyper-V host,  SAS mirror for host OS, raid 10 2TB for guest 
OS', currently one guest, 2012 with  Exchange 2013. 




Now there are 60 users, (still using original 2003 for File Print and DNS) and 
storage demands, as we all know are increasing exponentially, so I get the  "we 
need more storage " so this begs the question, new server 2u (R710 maybe) , or 
a NAS 8 or 12 bays
 maybe-



As an aside, majority of the users use basic office files,  but there are about 
a dozen that deal with CAD Audio and Video

I want this solution to be good for 3-5 years









 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jean-Paul Natola

 














 





CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material.
 Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any 
action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are 
prohibited. This information may
 be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 
1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use 
or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal 
penalties.

Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need 
to.


 

 



The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is from 
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals® (ASPCA®) and is 
intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally 
privileged and/or confidential
 information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the 
contents of this e-mail, and any attachments hereto, is strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this e-mail
 in error, please immediately notify me by reply email and permanently delete 
the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof.


 


Confidentiality Notice:

This e-mail, including any attachments is the 

property of Catholic Health East and is intended 

for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).  

It may contain information that is privileged and 

confidential.  Any unauthorized review, use,

disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are 

not the intended recipient, please delete this message, and 

reply to the sender regarding the error in a separate email. 

 






CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: The information transmitted, or contained or 
attached to or with this Notice is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain Protected Health Information (PHI), 
confidential and/or privileged material.
 Any review, transmission, dissemination, or other use of, and taking any 
action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient without the express written consent of the sender are 
prohibited. This information may
 be protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 
1996 (HIPAA), and other Federal and Florida laws. Improper or unauthorized use 
or disclosure of this information could result in civil and/or criminal 
penalties.

Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need 
to.

                                          

<<inline: image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to