Are there any other requirements you have before everyone makes suggestions?

 

For a NAS device I like the Qnap devices. Since you were debating between a
NAS and a Windows Server, why not look at a Windows Storage Server type
device? Since you are looking at Dell check out the PowerVault NX line.

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of J- P
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server

 

That was the basis of the original question, NAS or Server

NAS must haves, non-negotiable;

Redundant Power 
2 NICS and or a slot to put a spare NIC
AD Support
RAID
X number of supported connections
MINIMUM 4 bays, prefer 8

-

Now in retrospect your typical server already has everything mentioned above



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jean-Paul Natola
 



  _____  

To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] NAS or Server
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:25:22 -0400

For something that's just doing file storage I'd probably lean towards a NAS
device. If you want the flexibility to add additional features (DNS, DHCP,
DC,, print server, etc.....) I'd go with a dedicated server. Also what
features do you need in a NAS? Nic teaming, iSCSI support, dual power
supplies, RAID levels? All of that will determine you options. On the low
end  you could get something like this : 

 
<http://www.amazon.com/Synology-DiskStation-Diskless-Attached-DS1513/dp/B00C
M9K7E6/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1371736486&sr=1-1&keywords=Synol
ogy+DiskStation+DS1513%2B>
http://www.amazon.com/Synology-DiskStation-Diskless-Attached-DS1513/dp/B00CM
9K7E6/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1371736486&sr=1-1&keywords=Synolo
gy+DiskStation+DS1513%2B 




Christopher Bodnar 
Enterprise Architect I, Corporate Office of Technology:Enterprise
Architecture and Engineering Services 


Tel 610-807-6459  
3900 Burgess Place, Bethlehem, PA 18017 
 <mailto:> [email protected] 




The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America

 <http://www.guardianlife.com/> www.guardianlife.com 

        






From:        J- P <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 
To:        "[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> > 
Date:        06/19/2013 08:47 PM 
Subject:        [NTSysADM] NAS or Server 
Sent by:        [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>  

  _____  




Company background,

30 yrs old, started with 2 guys, went to to computers in the late 90's had
about 20 users, 1 W2k server and a 120 gb SNAP-

Fast forward , 2008,  30 users, sql 2005 DB  (consultant at the time )
installs a new 1U 2003 80gb raid server  for sql DB , and another 1U server
with a mirrored 750gb drive , serving as  DC/File/Print/DNS Server.

Fast Forward 2013 - single site , single domain

1. ESXi hosting a VM 2008 Citrix TS, and a VM 2003 DC (no storage really
available)
1. Windows 2012 Hyper-V host,  SAS mirror for host OS, raid 10 2TB for guest
OS', currently one guest, 2012 with  Exchange 2013.  

Now there are 60 users, (still using original 2003 for File Print and DNS)
and storage demands, as we all know are increasing exponentially, so I get
the  "we need more storage " so this begs the question, new server 2u (R710
maybe) , or a NAS 8 or 12 bays maybe-

As an aside, majority of the users use basic office files,  but there are
about a dozen that deal with CAD Audio and Video
I want this solution to be good for 3-5 years














Jean-Paul Natola

----------------------------------------- This message, and any attachments
to it, may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt
from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or communication of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the message and any
attachments. Thank you.


<<image001.jpg>>

Reply via email to