On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Miller Bonnie L.
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Are you able to flop one of the queues to print directly to the printer (no 
> spooling) and see if you still get hang-ups?  Advanced tab setting.
Good thought. I'll try that.

I did a run of a little over 800 pings, and got 1% loss - the start of
the run was pretty rough, though it settled down to most ping times of
<1ms after that:
Pinging 192.168.24.73 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time=227ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time=185ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time=168ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=254
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time=225ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254
Request timed out.
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=254
Request timed out.
Reply from 192.168.24.73: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=254

What's really weird is that the cmd box didn't update its display as
expected during the above sequence. Up until that last displayed ping
return, it would erratically hold on printing to the screen, and then
output several several lines at once. After the above sequence, it was
well behaved, printing out the ping responses as expected.

I've been looking at the performance stats for the VM and the host,
and don't see anything out of the ordinary.

Kurt

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 7:24 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] Odd spooler issue
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Miller Bonnie L.
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> How is ping time to the printers at the time of hang-up?
>
> I'll check that, but it's probably in the 1-2ms range
>
>> Can you view a web interface at the same time and see what they are doing?
>
> Yup - the printers are fine, AFAICT
>
>> Could be a slowdown on the spool disk, but I would expect it to happen to 
>> every queue on that server and not just certain ones.
>
> Agreed, and since the print server is a VM, it should show up across all the 
> VMs that use the SAN, and I'm not seeing that.
>
>> You could also open up the folder and see if the files are showing up in a 
>> timely manner, growing overly large, etc.
>
> Print jobs are on the order of 1-2k, and often less.
>
> Kurt
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 4:15 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [NTSysADM] Odd spooler issue
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I've got a little head scratcher, and would appreciate any insight folks 
>> might have.
>>
>> Printer Server: Win2k8 R2, fully patched VM running on vSphere 5
>> (recently gone from 5.0 to 5.1, the problem began on the earlier
>> version.)
>>
>> Problem: Print jobs from our installation of Epicor Avante to various
>> printers (an HP 2055 and several models of Zebra printer) hosted on
>> the printer server, will intermittently hang in the print queue. Delay
>> will range anywhere from 1.5 - 2 minutes, and they they'll print. I
>> can see the jobs in queue, just sitting there (they have a status of
>> 'printing', but do nothing.)
>>
>> I am seeing nothing in the event viewer for the printer server that
>> looks relevant, and certainly no warnings or errors. Neither memory
>> nor CPU spike
>>
>> The Avante server is running Win2k3 R2.
>>
>> The problem disappears and reappears a couple of times a week.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Kurt
>>
>>
>
>


Reply via email to