Ya know - I searched that database, and I didn't find MAPI in there.
Did you see it?

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Michael B. Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As of last month, all of the protocols are public. Now, I guess, Microsoft
>  does have to compete on the merits, eh what?
>
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Michael B. Smith
>  MCSE/Exchange MVP
>  http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>  From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 6:01 PM
>  To: NT System Admin Issues
>
>
> Subject: Re: Had this, then lost it - blog about multiple Outlook sessions
>
>  On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Carl Houseman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > If you could get source to Exchange and it fell into the wrong hands,
>  those
>  > hands could be even better than they are now at writing
>  Exchange-compatible
>  > servers that run under Linux ...
>
>   And then Microsoft might have to compete on the merits of their
>  products.  Oh, the horrors!  ;-)
>
>  > Windows source is probably more accessible thanks to antitrust actions.
>
>   The Windows source is probably more accessible because a big chunk
>  of it was stolen from Microsoft a few years ago.  ;-)  You can still
>  find it floating around in the disreputable corners of the net.  Or so
>  I'm told... ;-)
>
>  -- Ben
>
>  ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
>  ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~
>
>
>  ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
>  ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~
>

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!    ~
~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm>  ~

Reply via email to