On Apr 14, 2011, at 11:34 PM, Nathan Rusch wrote: > Very true. Nothing in Nuke is “magic,” and nothing in Nuke is unheard of in > other packages. It’s the particular way the tools and elements are brought > together that makes it appealing, not some secret formula that makes your > images come out better. But that doesn’t mean Nuke is the final word, or > anything near it. For example, if 6.3’s particle system is 1/4 what Fusion’s > was 6+ years ago, I’ll consider it a great addition. > > You can do A+B*(1-a) just as easily in Fusion as you can in Nuke... you just > might not be as used to it. > > Oh, and you can RAM-cache your ops. :P > > -Nathan
Well, in that case good luck with comping your next summer block buster in Fusion and Toxic. My statement was based on practical experience. Feli ______________________________________________________________ [email protected] 2 + 2 = 4 www.elanphotos.com
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected] http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
