On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Nathan Rusch wrote: > > As an aside, I would add that the undertones of concern regarding Nuke now > being owned by people with little interest in anything beyond > return-on-investment numbers are perfectly valid as well.
I agree on this point. The financial interests of the new investors are worrisome. One would hope that if they do not meet their expectations, that they would quietly go away, without wrecking the company and the product in the process. As far as their ethics go, I don't know what to say. I'm not thrilled with what I heard about them, but on the other hand all of use put gas in our cars to get to work everyday. You got to pick your battles, because you really can't cut your own throat to make a point. Cheers, Feli ______________________________________________________________ [email protected] 2 + 2 = 4 www.elanphotos.com
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected] http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
