You can define any number of gizmos as separate viewer processes just like srgb/rec709, etc.... So you can have more then one IP essentially.
-deke On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:52, Randy Little <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah I mean it would be nice to have more then one IP. LIke you could > have several IP groups. Does that make since? Is there an easy way to > have several IP groups. Never tried it. > > I think its that I miss shake built in overlays. > > Randy S. Little > http://www.rslittle.com <http://reel.rslittle.com> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:18, Ivan Busquets <[email protected]>wrote: > >> If your show is using viewerProcess, then you still have the old Input >> Process for yourself, right? >> You can set up Input Process to happen either before or after the >> viewerProcess, depending on your needs, but you don't need to turn off >> either of them to see the other. >> >> Unless I'm misreading and your show's viewer options are actually set up >> as an Input Process node. If that's the case, I'd definitely recommend >> moving that into the viewerProcess dropdown, so the users still get the >> Input Process slot free to use for anything they need (an overlay, turning >> on/off an anaglyph view, a certain look, etc). >> >> I agree that this seems like a standard option in every other comp >> package, but having the ability to use Input Process for anything you need >> makes it a lot more flexible, IMHO. >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Randy Little <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Ron what I am saying is that I wouldn't want to be messing around with a >>> SHOW template viewer process that may have all kinds of hooks inside of it. >>> It would be nice if nuke could show "Alpha" as Transparent. I always >>> feel like Nukes viewer is just antique even compared to what was capable in >>> Shake 2. ( I know its way faster but the viewer options are so limited) >>> LIke to do what you are saying in an environment where its safe to do so >>> would also turn on/off all your other view processes. Then you have to have >>> the group open somewhere and go hunt for it just to toggle alpha >>> transparency on and off. Does it work? Sure. Does it seem like almost >>> every other compositing program dating back to at least combustion and maybe >>> even composite had or has this feature? Yes. is it a killer? No. >>> It sure would be nice though to have more of those viewer overlays that >>> shake had though. >>> >>> Randy S. Little >>> http://www.rslittle.com <http://reel.rslittle.com> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:09, Ron Ganbar <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> You simply make a bigger viewer process with more options in it that can >>>> be turned on and off. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Ron Ganbar >>>> email: [email protected] >>>> tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] >>>> +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] >>>> url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5 October 2011 19:06, Randy Little <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yeah how does that work if you already have a view process for a job. >>>>> >>>>> Randy S. Little >>>>> http://www.rslittle.com <http://reel.rslittle.com> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:39, Deke Kincaid <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> You can make the viewer go through any gizmo/group. Just take the >>>>>> example Ron gave and register it as a viewer process. >>>>>> >>>>>> -deke >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 06:14, Ron Ganbar <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Make a checkerboard and put everything over it? Wrap it up in a group >>>>>>> and use it as VIEWER_INPUT. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ron Ganbar >>>>>>> email: [email protected] >>>>>>> tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] >>>>>>> +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] >>>>>>> url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5 October 2011 15:03, blemma >>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ** >>>>>>>> Hi. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there a way to view the alpha as a transparancy grid? Like AE or >>>>>>>> Fusion. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>>>>> [email protected], >>>>>>>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
