You can register multiple viewerProcesses, not IP's. That's why I was recommending to use viewerProcesses for anything that needs to be shared across a show (like a 3D lut, any additional "looks", crop guides, etc), and leave the IP free for the artists to use anything they want in there.
It's just an opinion, but I find people make a lot more use of the IP if it doesn't interfere with anything else (like, they won't loose any of the show's predefined looks if they switch their IP on and off) Cheers, Ivan On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Deke Kincaid <[email protected]> wrote: > You can define any number of gizmos as separate viewer processes just like > srgb/rec709, etc.... So you can have more then one IP essentially. > > -deke > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:52, Randy Little <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yeah I mean it would be nice to have more then one IP. LIke you could >> have several IP groups. Does that make since? Is there an easy way to >> have several IP groups. Never tried it. >> >> I think its that I miss shake built in overlays. >> >> Randy S. Little >> http://www.rslittle.com <http://reel.rslittle.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:18, Ivan Busquets <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> If your show is using viewerProcess, then you still have the old Input >>> Process for yourself, right? >>> You can set up Input Process to happen either before or after the >>> viewerProcess, depending on your needs, but you don't need to turn off >>> either of them to see the other. >>> >>> Unless I'm misreading and your show's viewer options are actually set up >>> as an Input Process node. If that's the case, I'd definitely recommend >>> moving that into the viewerProcess dropdown, so the users still get the >>> Input Process slot free to use for anything they need (an overlay, turning >>> on/off an anaglyph view, a certain look, etc). >>> >>> I agree that this seems like a standard option in every other comp >>> package, but having the ability to use Input Process for anything you need >>> makes it a lot more flexible, IMHO. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Randy Little <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Ron what I am saying is that I wouldn't want to be messing around with a >>>> SHOW template viewer process that may have all kinds of hooks inside of it. >>>> It would be nice if nuke could show "Alpha" as Transparent. I always >>>> feel like Nukes viewer is just antique even compared to what was capable in >>>> Shake 2. ( I know its way faster but the viewer options are so limited) >>>> LIke to do what you are saying in an environment where its safe to do so >>>> would also turn on/off all your other view processes. Then you have to >>>> have >>>> the group open somewhere and go hunt for it just to toggle alpha >>>> transparency on and off. Does it work? Sure. Does it seem like almost >>>> every other compositing program dating back to at least combustion and >>>> maybe >>>> even composite had or has this feature? Yes. is it a killer? No. >>>> It sure would be nice though to have more of those viewer overlays that >>>> shake had though. >>>> >>>> Randy S. Little >>>> http://www.rslittle.com <http://reel.rslittle.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:09, Ron Ganbar <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> You simply make a bigger viewer process with more options in it that >>>>> can be turned on and off. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ron Ganbar >>>>> email: [email protected] >>>>> tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] >>>>> +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] >>>>> url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 5 October 2011 19:06, Randy Little <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yeah how does that work if you already have a view process for a job. >>>>>> >>>>>> Randy S. Little >>>>>> http://www.rslittle.com <http://reel.rslittle.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:39, Deke Kincaid <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> You can make the viewer go through any gizmo/group. Just take the >>>>>>> example Ron gave and register it as a viewer process. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -deke >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 06:14, Ron Ganbar <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Make a checkerboard and put everything over it? Wrap it up in a >>>>>>>> group and use it as VIEWER_INPUT. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ron Ganbar >>>>>>>> email: [email protected] >>>>>>>> tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] >>>>>>>> +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] >>>>>>>> url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5 October 2011 15:03, blemma >>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ** >>>>>>>>> Hi. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is there a way to view the alpha as a transparancy grid? Like AE or >>>>>>>>> Fusion. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>>>>>> [email protected], >>>>>>>>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>>>>> [email protected], >>>>>>>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
