Tutorial title? 'The Halcyon days of Laissez Faire Node Graphs are over!'
by your frustrated Comp Supervisor

On 4 October 2012 12:21, Frank Rueter <[email protected]> wrote:

>  • an annoying screeching sound and monitor flickering when nodes are
> dragged into nasty positions
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/4/12 12:17 PM, Marten Blumen wrote:
>
> to help the fight against 'wrong way' noodling we could use;
>
> • a new node-graph-gravity-feature that literally makes it harder to move
> nodes up ;) like swimming against a rip in the ocean. this would help new
> compers go-with-flow and comp down and side to side instead of up.
>
> • a nodegraph assessment tool that calls 'off side' on nodes that are out
> of order. maybe labeling them or colouring them
>
> • circuit-board layout training!
>
>
>
> On 4 October 2012 11:57, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>  I always use red and green like that.
>> my favorite - label the dots. And have one just before inputs so you can
>> easily see where each input came from.
>>
>> Howard
>>
>>    ------------------------------
>> *From:* Marten Blumen <[email protected]>
>> *To:* Nuke user discussion <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 3 October 2012, 23:52
>> *Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] Re: new comp stack node survey
>>
>> here's my 1st tip- set /preferences/ Node Graph-Arrows/ Up Arrow to
>> bright red - it visually warns up 'you're noodling the wrong way'
>> green for down, and, muted for left and right.
>>
>>  On 4 October 2012 10:36, Frank Rueter <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> yeah. I'd love to see some sort of educational tutorials on planning and
>> adjusting the work area in a node based environment.
>> that might actually go a long way. If I ever get enough time I might hit
>> up some of you for ideas on that and we can collate tips, tricks and
>> thoughts and pack them into a video
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/4/12 10:26 AM, Sam Cole wrote:
>>
>> +1 against, I've been to hell and back debugging scripts with
>> MultiLayer and banned its use back in the day.
>>
>> The screenshot you posted looks like a poorly planned comp, you're
>> trying to solve a problem by adding a layer based workflow into a node
>> based one. Now you have two problems.
>>
>> ./sam
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing [email protected], 
> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to