we could also come up with a little electroshock device that can be hooked up to nuke's python api

On 10/4/12 12:44 PM, Marten Blumen wrote:
Tutorial title? 'The Halcyon days of Laissez Faire Node Graphs are over!' by your frustrated Comp Supervisor

On 4 October 2012 12:21, Frank Rueter <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    . an annoying screeching sound and monitor flickering when nodes
    are dragged into nasty positions





    On 10/4/12 12:17 PM, Marten Blumen wrote:
    to help the fight against 'wrong way' noodling we could use;

    . a new node-graph-gravity-feature that literally makes it harder
    to move nodes up ;) like swimming against a rip in the ocean.
    this would help new compers go-with-flow and comp down and side
    to side instead of up.

    . a nodegraph assessment tool that calls 'off side' on nodes that
    are out of order. maybe labeling them or colouring them

    . circuit-board layout training!



    On 4 October 2012 11:57, Howard Jones <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        I always use red and green like that.
        my favorite - label the dots. And have one just before inputs
        so you can easily see where each input came from.
        Howard

            
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            *From:* Marten Blumen <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>>
            *To:* Nuke user discussion
            <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>>
            *Sent:* Wednesday, 3 October 2012, 23:52
            *Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] Re: new comp stack node survey

            here's my 1st tip- set /preferences/ Node Graph-Arrows/
            Up Arrow to bright red - it visually warns up 'you're
            noodling the wrong way'
            green for down, and, muted for left and right.

            On 4 October 2012 10:36, Frank Rueter
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                yeah. I'd love to see some sort of educational
                tutorials on planning and adjusting the work area in
                a node based environment.
                that might actually go a long way. If I ever get
                enough time I might hit up some of you for ideas on
                that and we can collate tips, tricks and thoughts and
                pack them into a video




                On 10/4/12 10:26 AM, Sam Cole wrote:

                    +1 against, I've been to hell and back debugging
                    scripts with
                    MultiLayer and banned its use back in the day.

                    The screenshot you posted looks like a poorly
                    planned comp, you're
                    trying to solve a problem by adding a layer based
                    workflow into a node
                    based one. Now you have two problems.

                    ./sam
                    _______________________________________________
                    Nuke-users mailing list
                    [email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>,
                    http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
                    
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users



                _______________________________________________
                Nuke-users mailing list
                [email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>,
                http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
                
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users



            _______________________________________________
            Nuke-users mailing list
            [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>,
            http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
            http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users


        _______________________________________________
        Nuke-users mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>,
        http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
        http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users




    _______________________________________________
    Nuke-users mailing list
    [email protected]  
<mailto:[email protected]>,http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
    http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users


    _______________________________________________
    Nuke-users mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>,
    http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
    http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users




_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to