So to get the toolbar at the bottom you you need to set the flag 
0x0000000000000020 on the rototools knob. But you have to clear the flag 
0x0000000000000010 first.

n=nuke.selectedNode()
n.knob('rototools').clearFlag(0x0000000000000010)
n.knob('rototools').setFlag(0x0000000000000020)

unfortunately the toolbar will be below the timeline then.

cheers
Patrick

----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Date: 06.02.2013 20:59:47
Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke 7.0v2 Roto node's FRUSTRATING BUGS ! ! !


> Custom Positioning could be possible with setting flags via 
> python(0x0000000000000020), Not sure if you're able to get the group, that 
> all the knobs from the toolbar are in. But if you can then it should work. 
> I'll check that once I'm in the office tomorrow.
> 
> cheers
> Patrick
> 
> Am 06.02.2013 um 19:46 schrieb Howard Jones:
> 
>> I've put in several requests for custom positioning so please add your voice.
>> I'd prefer them at the bottom too.
>>  
>> Howard
>> 
>> From: John Mangia <[email protected]>
>> To: Nuke user discussion <[email protected]> 
>> Sent: Wednesday, 6 February 2013, 18:36
>> Subject: Re: [Nuke-users] Nuke 7.0v2 Roto node's FRUSTRATING BUGS ! ! !
>> 
>> Personally, I'd prefer if the button were on the bottom of the viewer, it 
>> would also be closer to the timeline.
>> 
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Pat Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Lewis.. surely you can tweak that with some python wizardry?
>> On 6 Feb 2013 10:16, "Lewis Saunders" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Philippe Roberge wrote:
>> > I spent a whole day rotoscoping a running wolf and I
>> > encountered several bugs
>> 
>> While we're on the subject how does everyone feel about the new top
>> row of buttons in the roto/warper nodes?
>> 
>> I have to run the mouse along the row and read the tooltips every single 
>> time :(
>> 
>> The text labels in Nuke 6 were so much easier!
>> 
>> Grrr. Maybe it's just my brain?
>> 
>> --
>> Lewis Saunders
>> read a lot as a child
>> London
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to