Neat saved my ass many times. We hardly use denoise anymore.
Tested Revision DE:Noise and the result is not as clean as Neat.

Dave


On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Howard Jones <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> Neat just failed me - however still superior results to denoise - just not
> good enough.
> Denoise is usually good though. However always good to have more than one
> option.
>
> H
>
>
>
> On Nov 12, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Diogo Girondi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Never had much luck with the deNoise in Nuke, specially in footages with
> extreme grain. Neat on the other hand never failed on me.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Marten Blumen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I find the new deNoise is very good, Neat is a step above it but deNoise
> can be enough.
>
>
> On 13 November 2012 07:08, chris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 11/9/12 at 8:25 PM,  (Deke Kincaid) wrote:
>
> Have you messed with the “new” 6.3 denoise tool?
>
>
> i was really looking forward to that when it was announced, but
> unfortunately i haven't managed to good results using it so far :/
>
> i always assumed that i must be doing something wrong, but after several
> attempts, watching tutorials etc i kinda gave up and went back to neat
> video (like most other people here it seems).
>
> ++ chris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to