Nice Howard! I didn't know F_DeNoise was still lingering in there, sweet!
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Howard Jones <[email protected]>wrote: > In this case F_denoise beat neat. > What can I say I was surprised but it wasn't a detailed test. > > Any with all hidden nodes > 1) other - update all (but gives you all nodes) > > 2) 'x' over DAG and type in name. You need to know the exact name > (upper/lower case etc) > > 3) add it back in via menu.py > > I've done 3. > > Howard > > On 24 Feb 2013, at 01:10, Diogo Girondi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Neat is the best de-grain/de-noise I've used by far, highly recommend it. > > Nuke Denoise works ok but usually requires a lot of fiddling around to get > something not so close to what you get from Neat with literally two clicks. > > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 9:02 PM, adam jones <[email protected]> wrote: > >> hey hey >> >> when you say deactivated. do you mean removed from the menu? >> >> I tried to find it but was unlucky in this quest any pointers? >> >> -adam >> >> >> On 24/02/2013, at 8:32 AM, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Oddly enough F-degrain gave me the best result on this one test. Which is >> hidden after denoise came out so I've re-actived it. But neat is very very >> good >> >> Howard >> >> On 23 Feb 2013, at 20:57, David Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Neat saved my ass many times. We hardly use denoise anymore. >> Tested Revision DE:Noise and the result is not as clean as Neat. >> >> Dave >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Howard Jones <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> Neat just failed me - however still superior results to denoise - just >>> not good enough. >>> Denoise is usually good though. However always good to have more than >>> one option. >>> >>> H >>> >>> >>> >>> On Nov 12, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Diogo Girondi <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Never had much luck with the deNoise in Nuke, specially in footages with >>> extreme grain. Neat on the other hand never failed on me. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Marten Blumen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I find the new deNoise is very good, Neat is a step above it but deNoise >>> can be enough. >>> >>> >>> On 13 November 2012 07:08, chris <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 11/9/12 at 8:25 PM, (Deke Kincaid) wrote: >>> >>> Have you messed with the “new” 6.3 denoise tool? >>> >>> >>> i was really looking forward to that when it was announced, but >>> unfortunately i haven't managed to good results using it so far :/ >>> >>> i always assumed that i must be doing something wrong, but after several >>> attempts, watching tutorials etc i kinda gave up and went back to neat >>> video (like most other people here it seems). >>> >>> ++ chris >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
