hey hey when you say deactivated. do you mean removed from the menu?
I tried to find it but was unlucky in this quest any pointers? -adam On 24/02/2013, at 8:32 AM, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Oddly enough F-degrain gave me the best result on this one test. Which is > hidden after denoise came out so I've re-actived it. But neat is very very > good > > Howard > > On 23 Feb 2013, at 20:57, David Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Neat saved my ass many times. We hardly use denoise anymore. >> Tested Revision DE:Noise and the result is not as clean as Neat. >> >> Dave >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Howard Jones <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Neat just failed me - however still superior results to denoise - just not >> good enough. >> Denoise is usually good though. However always good to have more than one >> option. >> >> H >> >> >> >> On Nov 12, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Diogo Girondi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Never had much luck with the deNoise in Nuke, specially in footages with >>> extreme grain. Neat on the other hand never failed on me. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Marten Blumen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I find the new deNoise is very good, Neat is a step above it but deNoise >>> can be enough. >>> >>> >>> On 13 November 2012 07:08, chris <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 11/9/12 at 8:25 PM, (Deke Kincaid) wrote: >>> Have you messed with the “new” 6.3 denoise tool? >>> >>> i was really looking forward to that when it was announced, but >>> unfortunately i haven't managed to good results using it so far :/ >>> >>> i always assumed that i must be doing something wrong, but after several >>> attempts, watching tutorials etc i kinda gave up and went back to neat >>> video (like most other people here it seems). >>> >>> ++ chris >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
