In this case F_denoise beat neat. What can I say I was surprised but it wasn't a detailed test.
Any with all hidden nodes 1) other - update all (but gives you all nodes) 2) 'x' over DAG and type in name. You need to know the exact name (upper/lower case etc) 3) add it back in via menu.py I've done 3. Howard On 24 Feb 2013, at 01:10, Diogo Girondi <[email protected]> wrote: > Neat is the best de-grain/de-noise I've used by far, highly recommend it. > > Nuke Denoise works ok but usually requires a lot of fiddling around to get > something not so close to what you get from Neat with literally two clicks. > > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 9:02 PM, adam jones <[email protected]> wrote: >> hey hey >> >> when you say deactivated. do you mean removed from the menu? >> >> I tried to find it but was unlucky in this quest any pointers? >> >> -adam >> >> >> On 24/02/2013, at 8:32 AM, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Oddly enough F-degrain gave me the best result on this one test. Which is >>> hidden after denoise came out so I've re-actived it. But neat is very very >>> good >>> >>> Howard >>> >>> On 23 Feb 2013, at 20:57, David Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Neat saved my ass many times. We hardly use denoise anymore. >>>> Tested Revision DE:Noise and the result is not as clean as Neat. >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Howard Jones <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Neat just failed me - however still superior results to denoise - just >>>>> not good enough. >>>>> Denoise is usually good though. However always good to have more than one >>>>> option. >>>>> >>>>> H >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 12, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Diogo Girondi <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Never had much luck with the deNoise in Nuke, specially in footages with >>>>>> extreme grain. Neat on the other hand never failed on me. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Marten Blumen <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> I find the new deNoise is very good, Neat is a step above it but deNoise >>>>>> can be enough. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 13 November 2012 07:08, chris <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/9/12 at 8:25 PM, (Deke Kincaid) wrote: >>>>>> Have you messed with the “new” 6.3 denoise tool? >>>>>> >>>>>> i was really looking forward to that when it was announced, but >>>>>> unfortunately i haven't managed to good results using it so far :/ >>>>>> >>>>>> i always assumed that i must be doing something wrong, but after several >>>>>> attempts, watching tutorials etc i kinda gave up and went back to neat >>>>>> video (like most other people here it seems). >>>>>> >>>>>> ++ chris >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
