Neat is the best de-grain/de-noise I've used by far, highly recommend it. Nuke Denoise works ok but usually requires a lot of fiddling around to get something not so close to what you get from Neat with literally two clicks.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 9:02 PM, adam jones <[email protected]> wrote: > hey hey > > when you say deactivated. do you mean removed from the menu? > > I tried to find it but was unlucky in this quest any pointers? > > -adam > > > On 24/02/2013, at 8:32 AM, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > Oddly enough F-degrain gave me the best result on this one test. Which is > hidden after denoise came out so I've re-actived it. But neat is very very > good > > Howard > > On 23 Feb 2013, at 20:57, David Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Neat saved my ass many times. We hardly use denoise anymore. > Tested Revision DE:Noise and the result is not as clean as Neat. > > Dave > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Howard Jones <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Neat just failed me - however still superior results to denoise - just >> not good enough. >> Denoise is usually good though. However always good to have more than one >> option. >> >> H >> >> >> >> On Nov 12, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Diogo Girondi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Never had much luck with the deNoise in Nuke, specially in footages with >> extreme grain. Neat on the other hand never failed on me. >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Marten Blumen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I find the new deNoise is very good, Neat is a step above it but deNoise >> can be enough. >> >> >> On 13 November 2012 07:08, chris <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 11/9/12 at 8:25 PM, (Deke Kincaid) wrote: >> >> Have you messed with the “new” 6.3 denoise tool? >> >> >> i was really looking forward to that when it was announced, but >> unfortunately i haven't managed to good results using it so far :/ >> >> i always assumed that i must be doing something wrong, but after several >> attempts, watching tutorials etc i kinda gave up and went back to neat >> video (like most other people here it seems). >> >> ++ chris >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
