Neat is the best de-grain/de-noise I've used by far, highly recommend it.

Nuke Denoise works ok but usually requires a lot of fiddling around to get
something not so close to what you get from Neat with literally two clicks.


On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 9:02 PM, adam jones <[email protected]> wrote:

> hey hey
>
> when you say deactivated. do you mean removed from the menu?
>
> I tried to find it but was unlucky in this quest any pointers?
>
> -adam
>
>
> On 24/02/2013, at 8:32 AM, Howard Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Oddly enough F-degrain gave me the best result on this one test. Which is
> hidden after denoise came out so I've re-actived it. But neat is very very
> good
>
> Howard
>
> On 23 Feb 2013, at 20:57, David Yu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Neat saved my ass many times. We hardly use denoise anymore.
> Tested Revision DE:Noise and the result is not as clean as Neat.
>
> Dave
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Howard Jones <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>> Neat just failed me - however still superior results to denoise - just
>> not good enough.
>> Denoise is usually good though. However always good to have more than one
>> option.
>>
>> H
>>
>>
>>
>> On Nov 12, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Diogo Girondi <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Never had much luck with the deNoise in Nuke, specially in footages with
>> extreme grain. Neat on the other hand never failed on me.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Marten Blumen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I find the new deNoise is very good, Neat is a step above it but deNoise
>> can be enough.
>>
>>
>> On 13 November 2012 07:08, chris <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/9/12 at 8:25 PM,  (Deke Kincaid) wrote:
>>
>> Have you messed with the “new” 6.3 denoise tool?
>>
>>
>> i was really looking forward to that when it was announced, but
>> unfortunately i haven't managed to good results using it so far :/
>>
>> i always assumed that i must be doing something wrong, but after several
>> attempts, watching tutorials etc i kinda gave up and went back to neat
>> video (like most other people here it seems).
>>
>> ++ chris
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to