It does, doesn’t it. Any plans to release that as well?
Best, Chris On Jan 29, 2014, at 9:02 AM, Michael Garrett <[email protected]> wrote: > Very cool, and the Mantra to Nuke tool looks interesting too. > > > On 29 January 2014 10:19, Neil Rögnvaldr Scholes <[email protected]> wrote: > This looks awesome. Downloading now. > > I checked out your website Theodore and the Mantra tools also look really > cool. > > Neil Rögnvaldr Scholes > > www.neilscholes.com > On 29/01/14 13:21, theodor groeneboom wrote: >> Thats great to hear! I'm just waiting for Frank to approve the latest >> upload. >> >> Sprut on. >> >> >> On 29 January 2014 13:19, Martin Constable <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Theo >> >> The Bug is still there in the copy from Nukepedia. However, this is prob >> because the copy on the server has not refreshed (or something). >> >> The copy I edited myself is behaving well and getting sweeeeet results. >> >> martin >> >> >> On 29 Jan, 2014, at 8:43 PM, theodor groeneboom <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Martin, Ari & Ron, I've re-uploaded the file on Nukepedia. Let me know if >> > this one works, as I havn't seen this bug before. >> > >> > >> > On 29 January 2014 12:25, theodor groeneboom <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Ron, it seems Martin discovered this bug first. I've forgot to round a >> > float value to an int. Try replacing line 24 in the executeSim python >> > script with "task.setProgress(int(progress))". >> > I'll update the nukepedia file over lunch to include this. >> > >> > >> > On 29 January 2014 12:21, Ron Ganbar <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Indeed, wonderful stuff Theo. Well done. >> > I tried your examples and didn't get much joy, though. >> > Everything is fine until I read the Solver, and the resolution after that >> > turns to 256x256. I opened up the Group and it seemed to me the problem >> > was with the cache. I placed a new path for the cache and hit the cache >> > button and got the attached error. >> > >> > Anything you can help here? >> > >> > Thanks >> > R >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Ron Ganbar >> > email: [email protected] >> > tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] >> > +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] >> > url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Ari Rubenstein <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > Theodor >> > >> > This is excellent, thank you for your efforts. I've wanted a 2d fluid sim >> > in nuke for awhile, I can think of several uses. >> > >> > Going to try it out shortly, I'll provide feedback. >> > >> > Ari >> > Blue Sky >> > >> > >> > Sent from my iPhone >> > >> > On Jan 29, 2014, at 4:33 AM, theodor groeneboom <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Nuke-list, >> >> >> >> >> >> I spent some time earlier this year putting together a 2d fluid sim >> >> "framework" using gizmos. I've used it on a few shows and personal work >> >> and it seems to be fairly stable and lots of fun to use. >> >> >> >> <sprut_banner.jpg> >> >> >> >> I've abstracted Jos Stam's 1999 Siggraph paper "Stable Fluids" into >> >> Nuke's own nodes, making it a gizmo-centric fluid simulator. Its very >> >> easy to extend and learn from looking at the internals, something I hope >> >> the Nuke community will benefit from. >> >> >> >> <image12.gif><image00.gif> >> >> >> >> There's currently three nodes, SprutEmitter, SprutSolver and a >> >> diagnostics tool SprutInspect. >> >> I hope by releasing it to the public, other Nuke artists will pick it up >> >> and contribute to the system, and keep on sharing it. >> >> >> >> You can find the gizmos, docs and example scripts here : >> >> >> >> >> >> Its compatible with all three platforms, and most versions of Nuke. No >> >> install requirements, just copy and paste the nodes around like usual. >> >> >> >> I also want to give a shout out to Andre Hitsøy, Lucien Fostier & Michael >> >> Ralla for contributions and greideas! >> >> >> >> -theo >> >> >> >> www.euqahuba.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Nuke-users mailing list >> >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Nuke-users mailing list >> > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Nuke-users mailing list >> > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Nuke-users mailing list >> > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users > > _______________________________________________ > Nuke-users mailing list > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
