I had a chance to check this on a Mac, and it's practically interactive for a 4k latlong on an iMac in Nuke 7 or 8. This is compared to a recent dual processor Xeon Windows workstation where it is pretty much unusable.
On 14 October 2014 12:07, Michael Garrett <[email protected]> wrote: > Nathan, > > Thanks for mentioning. I had actually found that thread Frank started, > after I'd already emailed the list. Seems like it's the same issue and I > remember it cropping up around 8.x release time, on Windows at least. We > have a Mac Pro trashcan here as well so I'll try it with 7.x > > Michael > > On 13 October 2014 21:22, Nathan Rusch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There are some reported issues with certain nodes and/or node >> combinations in current versions of Nuke, and I believe SphericalTransform >> is one of the lucky winners. I think there was another thread about this a >> month or so back. >> >> -Nathan >> >> >> *From:* Michael Garrett <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Monday, October 13, 2014 9:41 AM >> *To:* Nuke user discussion <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [Nuke-users] SphericalTransform slowness >> >> In this case I needed the rotation knobs in SphericalTransform which >> wouldn't be too hard for me to add to your Blink version, but for this >> project there's no time. >> >> On 12 October 2014 20:20, Haarm-Pieter Duiker <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> There's a Blink script implementation of SphericalTransform here. >>> http://www.nukepedia.com/blink/transform/environmenttransform >>> >>> Might help. >>> HP >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Michael Garrett < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm using SphericalTransform in Nuke 8.0v5 on Windows 7 and it's >>>> extremely slow - much slower than I've experienced on other platforms with >>>> prior versions of Nuke. Is this a bug with the Windows build, or is it a >>>> larger issue with Nuke 8.x? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
