On 6/21/12 1:22 PM, John E Drake wrote:
JD: I disagree. Other requirements drafts, e.g., draft-fang-vpn4dc-problem-statement, have been published and others are in the works. What is so special about draft-narten?
It's the one that has been proposed as the basis for the deliverable. I don't understand why the others weren't, if that was why they were written.
JD: When did you decide it was your prerogative to specify the basis on which to adopt a draft as a WG draft?
I'm just trying to understand your objection, to see if there's something there I can agree with. Part of that is clarifying whether your complaint is technical or political. Melinda _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
