Linda, Thanks for the comments.
> > Your draft (http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-fang-vpn4dc-problem-statement- > 01.txt ) demonstrates the approaches on how to extend L3VPN to end > systems in data center. "draft-narten-nvo3-problem-statement" > describes the issues facing data centers with massive number of VMs > interconnected by virtualized switches. > > Majority of text in your draft is on how L3VPN can be extended to Data > Center. It would be good solution draft, because some tenants do want > to extend their VPNs (L2 or L3) into data centers. Our draft is not about "extending" tenant's L3VPNs to data centers but using L3VPNs as a data center virtualized solution. Is a combined problem statement/requirements draft for a data center virtualization using L3VPNs, including large scale data centers with massive number of VMs. It is not a solution draft. The solution draft is draft-marques-l3vpn-end-system, for example. > Since NVo3 current charter is only on studying problems and identify > requirement, it might be worthwhile to revise your draft focusing only > on the problems facing data centers when some tenants need to extend > their L3VPN to VMs within data centers. Again, this is not what our draft is about, namely it is not about tenants wanting to "extend" their L3VPN to SP or cloud provider data centers. As Luyuan explained before, the draft has started a problem statement for layer 3 VPNs as a data center virtualization solution, and then we extended it with the requirements for such a solution. Thanks! Maria > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of > > Yakov Rekhter > > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 2:44 AM > > To: Benson Schliesser > > Cc: Matthew (Matthew) Bocci; Luyuan Fang (lufang); [email protected]; > > Dennis Cai (dcai); Pedro Marques; draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem- > > [email protected]; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [nvo3] call for adoption: draft-narten-nvo3-overlay- > > problem-statement-02 > > > > Benson, > > > > > Dear NVO3 Participants - > > > > > > This message begins a two week Call for Adoption of > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem- > > statement-02 > > > by the NVO3 working group, ending on 30-June-2012. > > > > > > Please respond to the NVO3 mailing list with any statements of > > approval > > > or disapproval, along with any additional comments that might > explain > > > your position. Also, if any NVO3 participant is aware of IPR > > associated > > > with this draft, please inform the mailing list and/or the NVO3 > > chairs. > > > > Before considering adoption of draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem- > > statement, > > we should consider how this draft is related to > > draft-fang-vpn4dc-problem-statement (see below) ? Do these two drafts > > cover the same topic ? Are they complementary with each other ? > > Should both of these drafts be merged into a single draft, before > > being adopted by the NVO3 working group ? > > > > Yakov. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:50:53 CDT > > To: <[email protected]> > > cc: Pedro Marques <[email protected]>, > [email protected], > > "Dennis Cai \(dcai\)" <[email protected]> > > From: "Luyuan Fang (lufang)" <[email protected]> > > Subject: [nvo3] FW: New Version Notification fordraft-fang-vpn4dc- > > problem-sta > > ***tement-01.txt > > > > Dear colleagues, > > > > We have uploaded a new updated version of draft-fang-vpn4dc-problem- > > statement > > -01.txt (on 6/12), by Maria Napierala, Dennis Cai, and myself. > > Appreciate your review and comments. > > > > Thanks, > > Luyuan > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:48 PM > > To: Luyuan Fang (lufang) > > Cc: [email protected]; Dennis Cai (dcai) > > Subject: New Version Notification fordraft-fang-vpn4dc-problem- > > statement-01.t > > xt > > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-fang-vpn4dc-problem-statement-01.txt > > has been successfully submitted by Luyuan Fang and posted to the > > IETF repository. > > > > Filename: draft-fang-vpn4dc-problem-statement > > Revision: 01 > > Title: IP-VPN Data Center Problem Statement and > > Requirements > > Creation date: 2012-06-12 > > WG ID: Individual Submission > > Number of pages: 18 > > URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fang- > vpn4dc- > > proble > > m-statement-01.txt > > Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fang-vpn4dc- > > problem-st > > atement > > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/submission.filename }}-01 > > Diff: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-fang- > vpn4dc- > > problem > > -statement-01 > > > > Abstract: > > Network Service Providers commonly use BGP/MPLS VPNs [RFC 4364] as > > the control plane for virtual networks. This technology has proven > > to scale to a large number of VPNs and attachment points, and it > is > > well suited for Data Center connectivity, especially when > > supporting all IP applications. > > > > The Data Center environment presents new challenges and imposes > > additional requirements to IP VPN technologies, including multi- > > tenancy support, high scalability, VM mobility, security, and > > orchestration. This document describes the problems and defines > the > > new requirements. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > _______________________________________________ > > nvo3 mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 > > _______________________________________________ > > nvo3 mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
