David,

Thank you.   This is helpful information.
Can you comment at all on extensibility & support for VXLAN-GPE & the other
options?

Regards,
Alia

On Jul 22, 2016 3:41 PM, "David Melman" <davi...@marvell.com> wrote:

> > Though if someone knows of a vendor who plans to support vxlan-gpe on
> their already installed vxlan supporting hardware please speak up. I
> certainly did not check with every vendor.
>
>
>
> As a silicon vendor, Marvell have the same silicon that supports both
> VXLAN and VXLAN-GPE.  Our customers can indeed support both on the same
> hardware.
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
> *From:* nvo3 [mailto:nvo3-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Jon Hudson
> *Sent:* Friday, July 22, 2016 11:58 AM
> *To:* Dino Farinacci
> *Cc:* Matthew Bocci; Tom Herbert; nvo3@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [nvo3] Consensus call on encap proposals
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > - VXLAN-GPE does not appear compatible with VXLAN-GPE. If a VXLAN host
> receives a VXLAN packet for some protocol other than Ethern the payload
> will be misinterpreted. A separate port number was required. I assume that
> a user using VXLAN in HW must upgrade HW to use VXLAN-GPE
>
> Tom, one clarification. Did you really mean VXLAN-GPE is not compatible
> with VXLAN-GPE or did you mean VXLAN?
>
> This is how a VXLAN-GPE encapsulator (an upgraded system) can talk to a
> VXLAN decapsulator (an existing system) with the LISP control-plane:
>
> (1) The encapsulator does a lookup on a MAC address to the mapping system.
> (2) What gets retunred is the decapsultor’s IP address and an
> encapsulation format. In this case the encapsulation format is VXLAN.
> (3) The VXLAN-GPE supuported encapsulator then encapsulates packets with
> UDP port 4789.
>
> I am told you can do this with BGP as well by negotiating what
> encapsulations are supported.
>
>
>
> However, most product managers are not nearly as clever as you are Dino,
> and as far as I know Users who today have HW that supports vxlan will have
> to buy new switches or line cards to support vxlan-gpe.
>
>
>
> Though if someone knows of a vendor who plans to support vxlan-gpe on
> their already installed vxlan supporting hardware please speak up. I
> certainly did not check with every vendor.
>
>
>
> Jon
>
>
>
>
> Dino
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> nvo3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> "Do not lie. And do not do what you hate."
>
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> nvo3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
>
>
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
nvo3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

Reply via email to