On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:21:09 -0400
"Anurag S. Maskey" <Anurag.Maskey at Sun.COM> wrote:
> On SIGHUP, do we really want to nwamd_fini_ncus()? This resets
> everything for the NCUs and restarts all the state machines. I remember
> discussing this earlier and we decided that it was not necessary to tear
> down everything with fini on SIGHUP.
I think conceptually SIGTHAW and SIGHUP should be the same. For this
push I'd prefer to be overly aggressive. I think it is a good RFE to
not be as aggressive with bringing up/down network objects (esp.
interfaces). This isn't the only place that would be effected.
I also think that we would be leaking objects if we don't. But that
could be fixed separately if we want.
mph
>
> Anurag
>
>
>
> Renee Danson Sommerfeld wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 04:58:48PM -0700, Michael Hunter wrote:
> >
> >> Code review corrections. Note that the removal of the broken soft
> >> reset file code will result in a (post integration) RFE.
> >>
> >> file:///net/coupe.eng/builds/mph/nwam1_cr_fixes/webrev/index.htm
> >>
> >
> > This link should be
> >
> > file:///net/coupe.eng/builds/mph/nwam1_cr_fixes/webrev/index.html
> >
> > (the final 'l' was missing)
> >
> > -renee
> > _______________________________________________
> > nwam-dev mailing list
> > nwam-dev at opensolaris.org
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/nwam-dev
> >
