>> With this fini we are reverting our changes. We should find out why bug >> 9431 was filed in the first place. >> > > You filed and fixed the bug. Fill us in :) > The decision came out from one of the meetings over the summer summer when we had those daily meetings. The description of the bug shows that the decision was already made on what to do when the bug was filed. Maybe Renee or Alan remembers more on this. I think when somebody did a "svcadm refresh nwam", we do not want to tear down the network just because of that. The user may have just changed one of the SMF properties (like debug) and we destroy the network configuration).
Anurag > >>> I also think that we would be leaking objects if we don't. But that >>> could be fixed separately if we want. >>> >>> >> Objects are not leaked if we don't fini them. The _handle_init_event() >> code reads in new objects and frees the old objects. If that's not >> happening, then bugs should be filed. >> > > Okay. > > mph > > >> Anurag >> >>
