> This is the crux of what I'm asking here. Am I not violating the GPL if I > make source code inaccessible that has already been distributed.
Interesting point. I would just 'undistribute' it anyway (assuming you still can). No one is going to sue you for doing that. You could argue that it is not distributed until it is uploaded to the site for the OS project it belongs to (eg silverstripe.co.nz) and that passing it to a site for 'testing' does not involve distribution especially, as it appears that 'test' has failed (client rejected it). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
