So you are saying that it is too late and the client will already have a copy of the new scripts?
On Jul 27, 2:44 pm, Jochen Daum <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Kent Parker <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > This is the crux of what I'm asking here. Am I not violating the GPL if I > > > make source code inaccessible that has already been distributed. > > > Interesting point. I would just 'undistribute' it anyway (assuming > > you still can). No one is going to sue you for doing that. You could > > argue that it is not distributed until it is uploaded to the site for > > the OS project it belongs to (eg silverstripe.co.nz) and that passing > > it to a site for 'testing' does not involve distribution especially, > > as it appears that 'test' has failed (client rejected it). > > But playing devils advocate here, the client is surely going to argue the > opposite. In fact I do advise people that this is exactly the benefit of > open source - if they can get their hands on the code they at least have the > option to run with it. > > But thanks, if noone has encountered this problem, maybe its not worth > bothering with it. > > Kind Regards, > > Jochen Daum > > Chief Automation Officer > Automatem Ltd > > Phone:09 630 3425 > Mobile:021 567 853 > Email: [email protected] > Skype: jochendaum > Website:www.automatem.co.nzhttp://twitter.com/automatemhttp://www.xing.com/go/invite/3425509.181107 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
