Hi, On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Kent Parker <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > This is the crux of what I'm asking here. Am I not violating the GPL if I > > make source code inaccessible that has already been distributed. > > Interesting point. I would just 'undistribute' it anyway (assuming > you still can). No one is going to sue you for doing that. You could > argue that it is not distributed until it is uploaded to the site for > the OS project it belongs to (eg silverstripe.co.nz) and that passing > it to a site for 'testing' does not involve distribution especially, > as it appears that 'test' has failed (client rejected it). But playing devils advocate here, the client is surely going to argue the opposite. In fact I do advise people that this is exactly the benefit of open source - if they can get their hands on the code they at least have the option to run with it. But thanks, if noone has encountered this problem, maybe its not worth bothering with it. Kind Regards, Jochen Daum Chief Automation Officer Automatem Ltd Phone: 09 630 3425 Mobile: 021 567 853 Email: [email protected] Skype: jochendaum Website: www.automatem.co.nz http://twitter.com/automatem http://www.xing.com/go/invite/3425509.181107 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ NZ PHP Users Group: http://groups.google.com/group/nzphpug To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
