hi all

jukka and myself just were sitting together to define an very
first draft of the oak-api just to have something to start with
and to have a basis for further discussions.

i will commit it as soon as i run the build without error.

it will consist of an initial Service that provides
- login providing a sessioninfo
- ability to retrieve a Connection for that sessioninfo

the Connection (still to be defined it this represent a workspace
or the whole repository) would then give access to node states (based
on permissions for the session associated with it), be in charge
of validating changes to be committed and executing queries.

will doing so we still had a lot of open questions some of which
are marked as todos in the interfaces.

feedback is welcome

regards
angela

On 3/28/12 3:50 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:


On 28.3.12 14:27, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,

Could you come up with an implementation which does not directly depend
on the Microkernel but rather uses a (to be defined) API on oak-core?

Sure, let's define such an API.

I'll try to come up with some ideas later today. Need to get a clearer
picture for myself first.


I'm in the process of removing all dependencies from oak-jcr to oak-mk
(OAK-20) so this will ultimately break.

Sure. What I used is a temporary workaround, this is not meant to stay as
it is.

Ok great.

Michael


Regards,
Thomas

Reply via email to