hi michi
just as an additional side note:
the conversation between jukka and myself also included some
first ideas on how a given repository is being created,
who is being in charge of the initial setup and creating the
mk and the service instance and how once the repository
exists a new instance of the JCR repository is being retrieved
from the factory.
jukka promised to work on this such that we will soon be able
to get a clearer picture here as this basically has an impact
on everything related to oak-jcr and oak-core.
kind regards
angela
On 3/28/12 4:58 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
Great! I was just about to start working on this since this is also a
prerequisite for getting OAK-20 resolved. I'll have a look at the draft
and let you know.
Michael
On 28.3.12 15:11, Angela Schreiber wrote:
hi all
jukka and myself just were sitting together to define an very
first draft of the oak-api just to have something to start with
and to have a basis for further discussions.
i will commit it as soon as i run the build without error.
it will consist of an initial Service that provides
- login providing a sessioninfo
- ability to retrieve a Connection for that sessioninfo
the Connection (still to be defined it this represent a workspace
or the whole repository) would then give access to node states (based
on permissions for the session associated with it), be in charge
of validating changes to be committed and executing queries.
will doing so we still had a lot of open questions some of which
are marked as todos in the interfaces.
feedback is welcome
regards
angela
On 3/28/12 3:50 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:
On 28.3.12 14:27, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Hi,
Could you come up with an implementation which does not directly depend
on the Microkernel but rather uses a (to be defined) API on oak-core?
Sure, let's define such an API.
I'll try to come up with some ideas later today. Need to get a clearer
picture for myself first.
I'm in the process of removing all dependencies from oak-jcr to oak-mk
(OAK-20) so this will ultimately break.
Sure. What I used is a temporary workaround, this is not meant to
stay as
it is.
Ok great.
Michael
Regards,
Thomas
