Just to be explicit: Below isn't a "veto", as long as we can get a 1.2.1 very (very) soon with this fix.
Thanks! Laurie On 4/9/15 7:44 AM, "Laurie Byrum" <[email protected]> wrote: >Marcel, >If it isn't too late, can we wait for >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2740 ? Angela said she is >working on it 10 minutes ago. > >Thanks >Laurie > > >On 4/9/15 6:57 AM, "Marcel Reutegger" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.0 release is available at: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.2.0/ >> >>The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: >> >> >>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.2.0 >>/ >> >>The SHA1 checksum of the archive is >>42c81485dc080f3c1b455d2e61e9744a971f706b. >> >>A staged Maven repository is available for review at: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/ >> >>The command for running automated checks against this release candidate >>is: >> >> $ sh check-release.sh oak 1.2.0 >>42c81485dc080f3c1b455d2e61e9744a971f706b >> >>Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.0. >>The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at >>least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.0 >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... >> >> >>Regards >> Marcel >> >
