Hi Laurie

The fix is attached to the issue along with a trivial test-case
illustrating the bug in the AuthorizationContext.

Kind regards
Angela

On 09/04/15 17:38, "Laurie Byrum" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Just to be explicit: Below isn't a "veto", as long as we can get a 1.2.1
>very (very) soon with this fix.
>
>Thanks!
>Laurie
>
>
>On 4/9/15 7:44 AM, "Laurie Byrum" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Marcel,
>>If it isn't too late, can we wait for
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2740 ? Angela said she is
>>working on it 10 minutes ago.
>>
>>Thanks
>>Laurie
>>
>>
>>On 4/9/15 6:57 AM, "Marcel Reutegger" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.0 release is available at:
>>>
>>>    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.2.0/
>>>
>>>The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>>>
>>>    
>>>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.2.
>>>0
>>>/
>>>
>>>The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
>>>42c81485dc080f3c1b455d2e61e9744a971f706b.
>>>
>>>A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>>>
>>>    https://repository.apache.org/
>>>
>>>The command for running automated checks against this release candidate
>>>is:
>>>
>>>    $ sh check-release.sh oak 1.2.0
>>>42c81485dc080f3c1b455d2e61e9744a971f706b
>>>
>>>Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.0.
>>>The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>>>least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
>>>
>>>    [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.2.0
>>>    [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>
>>>
>>>Regards
>>> Marcel
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to