On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Chetan Mehrotra <chetan.mehro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The in memory index would be managed on each cluster node and > has visibility to *local* changes happening on that cluster node. So > it would certainly not provide a cluster wide real time search. But it > help in those cases where user is performing changes via his session > established with a single cluster node and is not able to see affect > of his latest changes. > Ok, the objective is to support real time search for local changes. Makes sense. Thanks!
