On 3.9.15 11:58 , Julian Sedding wrote:
I know that Oak has a flat module structure. Still I would think that putting these split modules + something like "oak-tools-commons" into a folder called "tools". What do others think? Does anyone have strong feelings for staying with a flat structure?
It wasn't always so flat. Only recently some stuff has been removed flattening it out. So IMO there is no problem with sub-modules as long as they make sense.
- oak-dev-tools - oak-upgrade - oak-ops-tool
+1 and maybe put those into a oak-tools folder and change the naming a bit: oak-tools/ oak-tools/oak-development oak-tools/oak-upgrade oak-tools/oak-operations Michael
