On 04/09/2015 10:01, Michael Dürig wrote: > > > On 3.9.15 11:58 , Julian Sedding wrote: >> I know that Oak has a flat module structure. Still I would think that >> putting these split modules + something like "oak-tools-commons" into >> a folder called "tools". What do others think? Does anyone have strong >> feelings for staying with a flat structure? > > It wasn't always so flat. Only recently some stuff has been removed > flattening it out. So IMO there is no problem with sub-modules as long > as they make sense. > >>>> - oak-dev-tools >>>> - oak-upgrade >>>> - oak-ops-tool >>> > > +1 and maybe put those into a oak-tools folder and change the naming a > bit: > > oak-tools/ > oak-tools/oak-development > oak-tools/oak-upgrade > oak-tools/oak-operations Michael, could you please follow-up about this division on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3134 and put what module each functionality (you think) should be?
I've already made space in the issue description. Cheers DAvide
