Hi Oliver, If I understand your mail correctly, you gave a -1 to every proposed option. Can you be a little bit more constructive about your approach, or explain the message that is evidently hidden in your email?
Regards, Francesco 2016-04-28 11:43 GMT+02:00 Oliver Lietz <[email protected]>: > On Monday 25 April 2016 16:46:45 Michael Dürig wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There is a couple of names that came up in the discussion [1]: > > > > oak-local-store > > oak-segment-file > > oak-embedded-store > > oak-segment-store > > oak-segment-tar > > oak-segment-next > > > > Please vote which of the above six options you would like to see as the > > final name for oak-segment-next [2]: > > > > Put +1 next to those names that you favour, put -1 to veto names and > > remove the remaining names. Please justify any veto as otherwise it is > > non binding. > > > > The name with the most +1 votes and without any -1 vote will be chosen. > > oak-local-store -1 > oak-segment-file -1 > oak-embedded-store -1 > oak-segment-store -1 > oak-segment-tar +1 > oak-segment-next -1 > > Regards, > O. > > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours. > > > > Michael > > > > > > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/ktk7szjxtucpqd2o > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4245 > >
