Hello Vikas, thanks for your reply. By property indices did you mean the 'propertyIndex' attribute?
For example, we are using the following index definition: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <jcr:root xmlns:oak="http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/ns/1.0" xmlns:sling="http://sling.apache.org/jcr/sling/1.0" xmlns:jcr="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/1.0" xmlns:nt="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0" xmlns:rep="internal" jcr:primaryType="oak:Unstructured" async="async" compatVersion="{Long}2" evaluatePathRestrictions="{Boolean}true" includedPaths="[/home]" queryPaths="[/home]" reindex="{Boolean}false" reindexCount="{Long}6" type="lucene"> <indexRules jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured"> <nt:base jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured"> <properties jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured"> <primaryType name="jcr:primaryType" propertyIndex="{Boolean}true" jcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured"/> </properties> </nt:base> </indexRules> </jcr:root> And this guy are stucked in a infinite loop. Could be related with some corruption on repository? Thanks. On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Vikas Saurabh <vikas.saur...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > That most often happens with async index updates. Logger name in this > case for log message for the loop you're describing would have > "AsyncIndexUpdate". > You can enabled DEBUG log for > "org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.AsyncIndexUpdate" which > should then log an exception the next time around it restarts > (Actually, it would have logged some error the first time around it > hit the exception). > > Otoh, if the index is covering property indices, then you might be > hitting some other issue(s). > > Thanks, > Vikas > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Thiago Sanches <tsi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello guys, > > > > I'm new with oak indexes and I'm using it with Adobe AEM. Here we created > > some indexes that it's seems that they are stucked in a infinite looping > > for example: > > > > Reindexing Traversed #40000 ... > > Reindexing Traversed #50000 ... > > Reindexing Traversed #60000 ... > > > > This process are decreasing the system performance. > > I could not find any information about that. > > Could you have any advice? > > > > Thanks. >