Hi Tomek, On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 05:03 +0000, Tomek Rekawek wrote: > Hello Bertrand, > > this seems like an opposite of the composite node store - rather than > combining multiple repositories together, we’re trying to split one > repository into many jails. Maybe I’m too optimistic, but I think the > implementation should be quite easy if done on the node store level.
(snip) But that would require support in the various Oak subsystems, like indexing, node types, etc right? Either that, or we create full self- contained 'jails' with node type definitions, indexes, principals, etc. Robert
