Hi, 2.0 as in semantic versioning [1] is not backward compatible with 1.x.
Will it be the case ? Thanks, Andrei [1] http://semver.org/ <http://semver.org/> > On Oct 17, 2017, at 10:13 AM, Angela Schreiber <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Davide > > Sure... I already started doing so and there is a dedicated JIRA ticket > for that matter. > Feel free to contribute if you spot something that is missing or > misleading. > > Angela > > On 16/10/17 13:36, "Davide Giannella" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 13/10/2017 16:01, Matt Ryan wrote: >>> Makes good sense to me. Cutting the next release as a major version >>> reflects the high amount of change in dependencies that the downstream >>> should expect. >> >> +1. >> >> I think we should as well document somewhere in oak-doc the new bundles >> or where a code has migrated so that an upgrading consumer may find it >> easier to move between 1.6 and 2.0. >> >> D. >> >> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
