I vote for 1.8. I don't see any big changes that would justify version 2.0. The modularization (moving code around) is an ongoing process, I don't think this is "fixed", and shouldn't have a big impact on users.
- Consider making Oak 1.8 an Oak 2.0 Angela Schreiber
- Re: Consider making Oak 1.8 an Oak 2.0 Matt Ryan
- Re: Consider making Oak 1.8 an Oak 2.0 Tommaso Teofili
- Re: Consider making Oak 1.8 an Oak 2.0 Davide Giannella
- Re: Consider making Oak 1.8 an Oak 2.0 Angela Schreiber
- Re: Consider making Oak 1.8 an Oak 2.0 Andrei Kalfas
- Re: Consider making Oak 1.8 an Oak ... Angela Schreiber
- Re: Consider making Oak 1.8 an ... Andrei Kalfas
- Re: Consider making Oak 1.8... Angela Schreiber
- Re: Consider making Oak 1.8... Thomas Mueller
- Re: Consider making Oak 1.8... Torgeir Veimo
- Re: Consider making Oak 1.8... Thomas Mueller
- Re: Consider making Oak 1.8... Julian Reschke
- Re: Consider making Oak 1.8... Marcel Reutegger
- Re: Consider making Oak 1.8... Andrei Dulceanu
- Re: Consider making Oak 1.8... Davide Giannella
