I support the removal.
Denis
Based on the previous discussions and the opportunity for this to live
as an extension, I support removal.
Tim
*From: *Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com>
*Date: *Friday, September 12, 2025 at 12:53
*To: *oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
*Subject: *[OAUTH-WG] Call for WG Feedback on DID Resolution in SD-JWT VC
All,
This is an official call for getting the WG’s opinion on the last open
issue in draft-ietf-oauth-sd-jwt-vc-10 concerning the *removal* of the
*DID Document Resolution*.
In an early version of the SD-JWT VC document, we had three
Issuer-signed JWT Verification Key Validation techniques:
1. JWT VC Issuer Metadata
2. X509 based certificates
3. DID Document Resolution
Do you agree with the removal of the DID Document Resolution option
from the SD JWT VC specification?
Please note that this *does not *prevent future *extensions*.
Interested parties are free to define and publish an extension that
adds DID Document Resolution support, if desired.
Please, reply on the *mailing list *with your preference by *October 3rd*.
Regards,
Rifaat & Hannes
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list --oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email tooauth-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
