just spotted this... in the email from council which is being used as the 'permission' to keep the parks locked 24/7...
Mr Walsh Yes that's true I request have been received from Mrs Schultz and it was turned down for the same reason as yours . My OFFICE did explain why the park cannot be left open in the evenings as requested by Mrs Schultz. Therefore the park will still be locked in the evenings and re-opened in the morning as it has been the case. Thanks for the support and the interest. Sent by Partick Silo on 10/10 please note he mentions parks being locked in the evenings and reopened in the morning... NOT that they are to be locked 24/7. just a-saying... can't seem to get an answer to my question - is it legal for private citizens to restrict public access to council owned public open space? i ask as i have friends in other suburbs who are interested in doing the same to their parks. how on earth does one go about achieving this? can anyone answer? Thanks On Oct 11, 11:05 pm, Jezze <[email protected]> wrote: > I was actually also under the impression that I needed either a dog or > a child to qualify for park-user status. (And that I would have to > take it along if I went to the park!) Good to know that's not the > case. > > Jesse -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en.
