Hi Nick, Thanks for the wakening call. Let's see if the owner of the fork can be awaken, I have forwarded your plea. In addition I will take some time to think about possible futures of the project, it would be a shame to go into the attic as some parts, for instance the ODF validator - http://odf-validator.rhcloud.com/ are still widely being used.
Thanks, Svante On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Nick Burch <n...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi All > > After a bit of activity in October, sadly things in ODF Toolkit seem to > have quietened down a bit. Based on the feedback from the IPMC and the > board on the missed October report, ODF Toolkit is currently very close to > being retired as a podling. It's make or break time! > > So, first big question - is there any interest in keeping the project > going? Or should we just say "nice idea, shame it didn't work", pack up and > leave? > > If there is interest, then things need to happen! I think we can probably > all agree that ODF Toolkit isn't going to generate enough activity and > community in the next few months to make it to a TLP, but potentially could > do enough to be adopted by an existing TLP. No TLP will take on orphan > codebase though, they'll need to see a working and growing community before > they consider it. > > If people do want to keep the project going, some things are needed from > everyone! > * New release - Nothing for nearly 1.5 years looks bad > * Bug fixes - Let's include something in that release! > * Website - More information needed to help get new users started, more > examples, more use-cases etc > * Patches - are there any in JIRA? If so, can they get applied? Or at > least feedback given? > * Bugs - have they been triarged? Have the right questions for more > information been asked? Do they have unit tests? > * Plans - what else needs doing for the code? What areas could new > contributors work on? Is there the information they need to get > started? Are there bugs that new people could work on? > > Finally, the big one - new code. I heard rumours of new features happening > elsewhere. Does that still exist? Can that code be brought back? What can > be done to stop external hidden forks developing in future? > > Doing nothing is not an option - the project will be retired soon if > nothing changes. So, it's make or break time, and that means all of you in > the community need to do something while you still can! > > Nick > (With a Mentor hat on) >