Bonnie Corwin <Bonnie.Corwin at Sun.COM> writes: > Alan Coopersmith wrote: >> Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> >> >>> The only positive >>>decision made was to create a committee to stick your noses where >>>they don't belong, namely in approving the technical content of >>>an ongoing project (website). >> >> >> The website project is about the technical infrastructure running the >> website - the committee is to manage the content displayed by that >> website. Surely in the Apache Foundation the people who decide what >> appears on http://www.apache.org/ are a different group than those who >> decide what code goes into the httpd or tomcat projects? Why is it >> surprising that we have a similar distinction? >> > > The minutes say the committe will do the following: > > "He > added that this committee would be formed to approve editorial > changes to the content and commentary of the site, but explicitly > exclude infrastructure and the underpinnings of the website > application." > > What exactly does this mean? The words can be read to mean the > committee will approve all changes to all pages on the site, but I find > it hard to believe that was the intent.
I doubt it could be the intent, given content associated with projects and communities is surely their own. -- Rich
