On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:42:25PM -0800, Derek Cicero wrote: > Well, since the OGB voted to create a board, I suspected there was some > discussion of how the board should operate. > > Or is the expectation that the board itself will decide what they are > responsible for and how it is to be implemented?
It's very clear what the committee is and is not responsible for. How it will conduct reviews is for the committee members (as yet unappointed) to decide. If they're smart, they'll implement something like what John Plocher described, leaving people free to make small noncontroversial changes on their own. One would also hope that their review process is lightweight and offers quick turnaround in common cases. These attributes are obviously good, so I expect the committee to create a system that exhibits them. If it doesn't, the OGB could abolish or recharter it. -- Keith M Wesolowski "Sir, we're surrounded!" FishWorks "Excellent; we can attack in any direction!"
