Derek Cicero wrote: > John Plocher wrote: > >> Derek Cicero wrote: >> >>> What is the threshold for changes? (I assume we can fix typos w/o >>> approval?) >>> >> What sort of editorial policy are you expecting? >> > > Well, since the OGB voted to create a board, I suspected there was some > discussion of how the board should operate. > > Or is the expectation that the board itself will decide what they are > responsible for and how it is to be implemented? >
It was my impression the committee was to be confined to the homepage. There are tons of changes that happen in various non-project-specific/non-community-specific pages (John cited some: Roadmap, FAQ, etc.) - it doesn't make sense to me that a committee needs to be in charge of voting on all these changes. It also doesn't make sense to me to have the individual making the change make the decision as to whether it's a trivial change or not. Changes to the homepage are rare enough, and important enough, that I think having the committee focused specifically on the homepage is good. Having it in charge of other pages seems to be overly heavy-weight. If we really do want it to be an editorial committee in charge of pages at large, then I would ask that it be an oversight committee that "takes offense" at changes rather than requiring changes be brought before them for approval; if that makes sense. cheers, steve -- stephen lau | stevel at opensolaris.org | www.whacked.net
