Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 08:56:55AM -0800, John Plocher wrote: > >> My intent (if it matters :-) was to provide for a formal editorial >> team to be responsible for the non-Project and non-Community >> page content on OS.o. > > That was the purpose of this committee as I understood it as well. > > Project pages, Group pages, and the web app infrastructure are outside > the committee's jurisdiction. > >> The problem being solved here is that of >> "Who authorizes changes to pages that speak for the community?" > > Right. That meaning "The OpenSolaris Community", not any Group or > Project Team.
So is the OGB responsible for the putting together a plan as to how this will work? There are three basic actions for page: - Add a new page - Edit an existing page - Delete an existing page What is the threshold for changes? (I assume we can fix typos w/o approval?) What is the process around each of these actions? Who owns the approval process? Who handles conflicts? My feeling is that we are making a new process for all pages when the only thing that is really contentious is the home page. Does it make sense to begin with just a home page approval process and extend it as as needed (i.e. if someone raises a complaint)? Derek -- Derek Cicero Program Manager Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division
