John Plocher wrote: > My suggestion was that the people already doing this work (i.e., the > list of existing Leaders) be considered as candidates for (or defacto > members of) this committee; Rich got the AI to simply appoint them.
I think it's imperative that they *are* the committee, just a slightly more formalized one. If it's a case of saying 'Derek owns the website content, along with his team of X people' I'm fine with that - everyone knows where we're at, and we can move on. Glynn
