Darren.Reed at Sun.COM wrote: > The model that I envisage of how it should work is: > - ogb asks advocacy to go and do this > - advocacy goes and does it, comes back with a result > - ogb says "thank you" and gives it a stamp of approval. > > In other words, the advocacy group does all of the "hard work" > but it should still need to be ratified by the OGB.
The Advocacy CG can talk about these issues, flush out the text (which is required, by the way), do the legal work, come up with some concepts and maybe even some designs and then go to the greater community for a larger discussion. And who knows, maybe we'll get a final piece out of it. But I can't see the OGB having any role in this at all. I'll have to re-read the Constitution, I guess. Doesn't the OGB have more important things to do? Jim -- Jim Grisanzio http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris
