| Clark: It does not offend me that you don't like the logo. While there are certain technical aspects of logo design, it is still art. For some people it works, for others it does not. Thanks, tho, for not being rude about your opinion. IIt is good to know this was already debated; I won't try and restart the debate. Y'all have answered my questions and I appreciate that. I'll go away now. :-) I was really hopeful there was a standard logo recognized by someone like the OGF. Professionally, I'm a spacecraft avionics engineer. In my industry, we have a lot of standards. We use them even if they stink, because even a bad standard allows you to simplify design, construction, test, and operations of spacecraft, not to mention the benefits of collaboration across contractors. As Mark Oliva said in a following post, they are using their own logo with its unique license and will ignore anyone else's. Perfectly legitimate business strategy. However, they lack the market force to make their logo the de-facto standard (unlike Hasbro and the d20 logo), thus we're not going to use that logo. Thanks, everyone, for your comments. I think we'll stick with our own logo until the Open Gaming Foundation establishes a standard or until the community of gamers selects one through their market force. Best Wishes, Mark -- Mark Wilkinson Tower Ravens On Aug 11, 2006, at 12:33 AM, Clark Peterson wrote:
|
_______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
