Markus Wilkinson wrote:
...
I'll even add an icosahedron to my logo to see if you
like it better that way.
I know i'd probably like it less. Unless what you're really looking
for
is a "D20-System-but-we-can't-say-that logo", i'd say shy away from
icosahedrons in a logo designed to identify OGC-containing products.
heck, i'd also think it preferable to apply terms to the logo that
allow
it to be used with, frex, the Creative Commons and maybe EABA
licenses.
I appreciate the input.
I definitely don't want to say 'D20-System-but-we-can't-say-that-logo'.
I'm afraid that I've been too vocal in the past about not liking the d20
system (of course that was in context to the game we developed, but
everyone accused me of talking generally). I had to create a whole
website to clear the issue:
http://www.towerravens.com/univ-omnigamer.php?page=1
I'd rather not have an icosahedron on the logo (which is why the one
I made doesn't have one), but I'm more interested in a community
standard than what I personally want.
In the end though, I think the only thing that will pull this group
together enough to discuss adopting a standard logo is the
cancellation of the d20 System license. It is a more volatile topic
that I originally supposed.
So, I'm going to politely drop the subject, not call anyone names,
and not get my feelings hurt.
Mark
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
Ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
