At 07:27 AM 9/7/00 -0500, Justin Bacon wrote:
>That being said, I know *exactly* how to write a game using only the D20
>trademark license which will stand completely independent of the PHB.
>(And, no, I'm not going to tell you how to do it.) Even with that being
>true, however, I still suspect that my game will fuel sales of the PHB
>(if it were ever to fall into the hands of someone who wasn't already
>familiar with D&D).
>
Can anyone explain why the idea of 'helping WOTC sell more PHBs' is
apparently so morally repugnant, if the method of doing so also lines the
outside developers pockets as well?

That is, if someone offers me 100.00, but notes that for every 100.00 I
accept, he will ALSO give 50 dollars to Justin Bacon, I'd be an idiot to
refuse the money on the ground you'd get some, too. It's not like he was
originally offering me 150.00 and now I have to split it. 
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org

Reply via email to